Historic Criminals of Wall Street

align="center">telecommunications industry. By 2002 the company
Introductionhad filled the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history. What
Over the years Wall Street has had it’shappened is that over a six year period is the
share of criminals, who left behind despair and loss.company had made 63 acquisitions the largest one
To fully understand what these criminals did we mustwas MCI in 1997. This created several problems for
examine the individuals themselves, what they didthe company in that it can be difficult to integrate
and what is the legacy that they leave behind as athe old company with the new. Second it threw
result of their misdeeds. While no two are alike themassive amounts of debt on the company’s
lasting effects of their crimes can still be felt by Mainbalance sheet. To keep earnings growing the
Street to this very day. In the article below we willcompany would write millions of dollars in losses of
examine as well as gain a greater understanding ofthe company it acquired in the current quarter and
some of the largest Wall Street criminals to include:then have smaller losses going forward so that there
Ivan Boesky, Michael Milken, Bernard Ebbers andwas the perception that the company was making
Richard Whitney.more money than it really was. This gave World Com
Criminals of Wall Streetthe ability to take smaller charges against its earnings
A criminal is someone who has committed a crimeevery year and spread the large losses over
and been found guilty in a court of law of committingdecades. All of this worked great until the Justice
that crime or others. Since the beginning Wall StreetDepartment denied the company’s
has always had the criminals trying to hideacquisition of Sprint in 2000. When the company filed
themselves among the honest business people. Thefor bankruptcy they admitted that it inappropriately
crimes or scams that they have committed havebooked these losses from previous acquisitions from
been everything from insider trading to fleecing thethe period of 1999 to 2002. Ebbers also took
companies they run and investors of hundreds ofpersonal loans from the company and resigned as
millions of dollars. Below are some of the mostCEO in April 2002. He was convicted of fraud,
famous and unscrupulous Wall Street criminals.conspiracy and filling false documents with the SEC
Ivan Boesky: Ivan Boesky’s career on Wall(Securities and Exchange Commission). He was
Street began in 1966 as a stock analyst. In 1975 hesentenced to 25 years in prison. Ebbers legacy
had started his own arbitrage firm. By thecreated tighter reporting standards with the creation
1980’s his net worth was estimated to be inof the Sarbanes Oxley Act in 2002 as well as the
the hundreds of millions. Ivan looked for companiesforbidding of personal loans to officers of the
that were the target of takeovers. He would thencompany and stiffer penalties for financial related
buy a stake in the company on speculation thatcrimes.
news of a takeover was going to be announced andRichard Whitney: Richard Whiteny was the President
then sell the shares after the announcement for aof the New York Stock Exchange from 1930 to 1935.
profit. Throughout the 1980’s corporateOn October 24, 1929 he bought shares in many
mergers and takeovers were enormous. It 1986companies and the market had dramatic turnaround.
there was almost 3,000 mergers worth $130 billion.This allowed him to be viewed as a hero to the
Before the deals were announced the price of themarket but did little to prevent it’s inevitable
stocks were rising as a result of someone acting oncrash five days later. By 1930 he was made the
inside information that a takeover or leveragedPresident of the New York Stock Exchange.
buyout was going to be announced. When somethingWhitney, was an unlucky gambler who played penny
like this happens it a sign insider trading (where youand blue chip stocks aggressively. To cover his losses
are acting on information that is not made availablehe would borrow money from friends and business
to the public) and is illegal. This was indeed the caseacquaintances. This would allow him to buy even
with the Pacific Lumbar three days before the dealmore stock in a market that was collapsing, which
was announced Boesky had purchase 10,000 shares.made his problems even worse. In spite of all of this
As result of these and other insider trading activitieshappening he continued to live a lavish lifestyle. When
Boesky was charged with stock manipulation fromhe could no longer borrow any more money he
inside information on November 14, 1986. He agreedbegan to embezzle money from the from his
to pay $100 million fine along with being banned fromcustomers as well as an organization to help widows
trading stock professionally for life and serve time inand orphans. As time went on his fraud continued to
a federal prison . He cooperated with the SEC, tapingbecome more perverse when he looted the New
his conversations with Junk Bond Firms and others.York Stock Exchange’s Gratuity Fund of up
This led to both Drexel Burnham and Michael Milkento $1 million. This was fund was suppose to pay
being charged with securities fraud. The legacy that$20,000 to each members estate upon death, as
he leaves is one where greed at any cost does nottreasurer he decided that it was proper for him to
work. If you break the law eventually you will besteal from it. After an audit discovered the
caught. As result of these actions of Boesky andembezzlement he was charged with two counts of
others, Congress passed the Insider Trading Act ofembezzlement and sentenced to 5 to 10 years in
1988. The act increases penalties for insider trading,prison. The newly formed Securities and Exchange
provides cash rewards to whistle blowers, and allowsCommission required more frequent audits, it set
individuals to sue for damages because of insidercaps on how much debt firms can have and
trading violations.customer accounts are now separate from the
Michael Milken: In the 1980’s Michael Milkenproperty of brokerage firms. This is the legacy that
was known as the junk bond king. A junk bond isRichard Whitney left to Main Street.
nothing more than those corporations who have aConclusion
high probability of not paying the money back. If youSince Wall Street’s earliest days there have
wanted to raise money through high yield or junkbeen criminals who will try to disguise themselves as
bonds Milken was the person to call. He used thesehonest business people. Many of these crooks rose
bond to finance merger and acquisitions as well asquickly to power only to have a hard crash landing in
leveraged buyouts (LBO’s) for corporatethe end. This was exactly the case with Ivan
raiders. What he was doing was nothing more than aBoesky, Michael Milken, Bernard Ebbers and Richard
complex pyramid scheme. When one company wouldWhitney. While nothing will ever excuse what they
default he would then refinance some more debt. Indid it, in Milken’s case he has tried to do
turn both Milken and the Drexel Burnham wouldsome good by having a foundation for the benefit of
continue to make their fees as a result of this action.cancer patients, economics and education. What their
Drexel Burnham had made at least half ofexamples show us is that in spite of all the
it’s profits from the work of Milken. Laterregulations people will still try to find loop holes
on Milken also started purchasing stock in companiesaround them or simply disregard the law for one
that he knew would become potential takeoverpurpose greed at all costs. When these criminals have
targets. When Ivan Boesky was charged with insiderbeen exposed the government will then enact laws
trading in 1986 he helped implicate both the firm andto protect the public from this happening again. This
Milken in several insider trading scandals. This led tois the legacy that the criminals of Wall Street have
criminal charges against the firm and over 70 chargeson Main Street.
against Milken. He plead guilty and was sentenced 10Report this article
years in prison and paid $1 billion in fines. It is arguedThis article is free for republishing
that the Savings and Loan crisis in the lateSource:
1980’s and early 1990’s resultedRepublish this article
because so many of the institutions held large of
amounts of Milken junk bonds. This resulted in a hugeAsk a Question About this Article
government bailout. After he was released from>> Which band is featured in a poster on the
prison he focused his attention on his foundationwall in Orianthi's According to You video?
which supports cancer research, an economic think>> What happens if ain individual who does not
tank and education.have legal status in America is arrested for shoplifting
Bernard Ebbers: Bernard “Bernie”items valued at $1000?
Ebbers was the CEO of a small long distance>> Is In Re: Robert Dennis Frye Habius Corpus
company called World Com. With in 17 years he hadcase on docket at Los Angeles Superior Court?
taken the company to a position of dominance in the